Contribution
An agent's part in making the resource, and what that part was.
Agent and role with respect to the resource being described
BIBFRAME's definition of
bf:Contribution. The primer has a section on it.
Example
{
"@type": [
"Contribution",
"PrimaryContribution"
],
"agent": [
{
"@id": "http://id.loc.gov/rwo/agents/n94051979"
}
],
"role": [
{
"@id": "http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut"
}
]
}Trimmed from a real record rather than written for the occasion, and checked against this definition by tests/test_examples.py. A wrong example is worse than none, because it is the first thing anyone copies.
Properties
| Property | Takes | What BIBFRAME says it is |
|---|---|---|
rdfs:label | Text | defined by RDF Schema |
agent | Ref | Entity associated with a resource or element of description, such as the name of the entity responsible for the content or of the publication, printing, distribution, issue, release or production of a resource. (Associated agent) |
role | Ref | Function provided by a contributor, e.g., author, illustrator, etc. (Contributor role) |
Every property here holds an array, and a property this definition does not name is still checked: it must be an array too. Naming a property buys a check on what its values look like, and nothing else.
The schema
https://blue-core-lod.github.io/bibframe-json/schema/dialect/Contribution.json is this definition on its own, and https://blue-core-lod.github.io/bibframe-json/schema/dialect.json is the whole shape with every definition inlined. They are checked against each other over the conformance corpus, so either is safe to depend on.